Global Advanced Research Journal of Agricultural Science (GARJAS) ISSN: 2315-5094
October 2019 Vol. 8(9): pp. 275-284
Copyright © 2019 Global Advanced Research Journals
Full Length Research Paper
Evaluation of WARM model for simulating some rice varieties in Northern Delta
Shimaa A. Badawy
Department of Agronomy, faculty of agriculture, Kafrelsheikh University
*Corresponding Author's Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Accepted 25 October, 2019
The present research study was carried out to simulate rice yield by using WARM simulation model. Research on rice cropping systems carried out in Egypt has to face the great climate changes, and the linked abundance of cultivated varieties, characteristic of the high latitudes-temperate areas where rice is traditionally grown. Therefore, dynamic simulation models can provide a useful tool for system analysis needed to improve the knowledge, the agronomic management and crop monitoring. WARM (Water Accounting Rice Model) simulates yield of paddy rice (Oryza sativa L.), based on temperature-driven development and radiation-driven crop growth. It also simulates; biomass partitioning, floodwater effect on temperature, spikelet sterility, floodwater and chemicals management, and soil hydrology. Biomass estimates from WARM were evaluated .The test-area was Sakah, Kaferelsheikh (Egypt). Data collected from 2003 to 2012 from rice crop grown under flooded and non-limiting conditions were split into a calibration (to estimate WARM model parameters) and an evaluation sets. Plants were sampled during the life cycle from rice plots of two rice cultivars Sakha 101 and Giza 177 , maintained at potential production, to determine some important crop variables and parameters such as aboveground biomass (AGB), leaf area index (LAI), potential yield, specific leaf area, and the date of the main phonological stages. Results show that the model was able to simulate rice growth for both varieties. The assessment of model performances has shown average of relative root mean square error (RRMSE) calculated on AGB curves was above50% for the calibration and 30% for evaluation sets. The modeling efficiency (EF) is always positive and the coefficient of determination (CD) is always very close to 1. Indeed, intercept and slope were always close to their optima and (R2) was always higher than 0.90. The indices of agreement calculated for the evaluation datasets were better than the corresponding ones computed at the end of the calibration, indirectly proving the robustness of the modeling approach. WARM’s robustness and accuracy, combined with the low requirements in terms of inputs and the implementation of modules for reproducing biophysical processes strongly influencing the year-to-year yield variation, make the model suitable for forecasting rice yields on regional, national and international scales.
Keywords: WARM, Oryza sativa L., simulation model, flooded conditions, yield forecast, climate change
Anastacio PM, Frias AF, Marques JC (1999). CRISP (crayfish and rice integrated system of production): 1. Modelling rice (Oryza sativa L.) growth and production. Ecol. Model. 123, 17–28.
Bachelet D, Gay CA (1993). The impacts of climate change on rice yield: a comparison of four model performances. Ecol. Model. 65, 71–93.
Boschetti M, Bocchi S, Stroppiana D, Brivio PA (2006). Estimation of parameters describing morpho-physiological features of Mediterranean rice group for crop modelling purposes, Ital. J. Agrometeorol. 3, 17–25.
Bouman BAM, Xiaoguang Y, Huaqi W, Zhimin W, Junfang Z, Bin C (2006). Performance of aerobic rice varieties under irrigated conditions in North China, Field Crop. Res. 97, 53–65.
Casanova D, Epema GF, Goudriaan J (1998). Monitoring rice reflectance at field level for estimating biomass and LAI, Field Crop. Res. 55, 83–92.
Cassman KG, Peng A, Dobermann A (1997). Nutritional physiology of the rice plants and productivity decline of irrigated rice systems in the tropics.Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 43, 1101–1106.
Confalonieri R, Acutis M, Bellocchi G, Cerrani I, Tarantola S, Donatelli M, Genovese G (2006a). Exploratory sensitivity analysis of CropSyst,WARMandWOFOST: a case-study with rice biomass simulations, Ital. J. Agrometeorol. 3, 17–25.
Confalonieri R, Bocchi S (2005). Evaluation of CropSyst for simulating the yield of flooded rice in northern Italy, Eur. J. Agron. 23, 315– 326.
Confalonieri R, Gusberti G, Bocchi S, Acutis M (2006b). The CropSyst model to simulate the N balance of rice for alternative management, Agron. Sustain. Dev. 26, 241–249
Confalonieri R, Mariani L, Bocchi S (2005). Analysis and modelling of water and near water temperatures in flooded rice (Oryza sativa L.), Ecol. Model. 183, 269–280.
Confalonieri R, Rosenmund AS, Baruth B (2009). An improved model to simulate rice yield. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 29:463-474
Confalonieri R (2005). GAIA: a new model for the simulation of plant growth. Internal Report, Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, Ispra.
Day W (2001). Modelling crop physiology for integrated decision making. Ann. Appl. Biol. 138, 215–219.
Dingkuhn M., Johnson D.E., Sow A. andAudebert A.Y. (1999) Relationships between upland rice canopy characteristics and weed competitiveness, Field Crop. Res. 61, 79–95.
Dingkuhn M, Jones MP, Johnson DE, Sow A (1998). Growth and yield potential of Oryza sativa and O. glaberrimaupland rice cultivars and their interspecific progenies, Field Crop. Res. 57, 57–69.
Dingkuhn M, Sow A, Samb A, Diack S, Asch F (1995). Climatic determinants of irrigated rice performance in the Sahel – I. Photothermal and microclimatic responses of flowering. Agr. Syst. 48, 385–410.
Kiniry JR, Jones CA, O’Toole JC, Blanchet R, Cabelguenne M, Spanel DA (1989). Radiation-use-efficiency in biomass accumulation prior to grain filling for five grain crop species. Field Crops Res. 20, 51–64.
Kropff MJ, van Laar HH, Matthews RB (1994). ORYZA1: An ecophysiological model for irrigated rice production SARP Research Proceedings, International Rice Research Institute: Los Banos, Philippines, 110 p.
Lancashire PD, Bleiholder H, Langeluddecke P, Stauss R, van den Boom T, Weber E, Witzen-Berger A (1991). "An uniform decimal code for growth stages of crops and weeds". Ann. Appl. Biol. 119 (3): 561–601.
Loague KM, Green RE (1991). Statistical and graphical methods for evaluating solute transport models: overview and application. J. Contam. Hydrol. 7, 51–73.
Mae T (1997). Physiological nitrogen efficiency in rice: nitrogen utilization, photosynthesis, and yield potential. Plant Soil 196, 201–210.
Mahmood R (1998). Air temperature variations and rice productivity in Bangladesh: as comparative study of the performance of the YIELD and the CERES-Rice models. Ecol. Model. 106, 201–212.
Mall RK, Aggarwal PK (2002). Climate change and rice yields in diverse agro-environments of India. I. Evaluation of impact assessment models, Climatic Change 52, 315–330.
Nishiyama I (1995). Damage due to extreme temperatures. In: Matsuo, T., Kumazawa, K., Ishii, R., Ishihara, K., Hirata, H. (Eds.), Science of the Rice Plant, vol. 2. Physiology, Food and Agriculture Policy Research Center, Tokyo, pp. 769–800.
RRTC (2003-2011). Rice research and training center, Annual Reports 2003-2011,SakhaKafelsheikh, Egypt.
Sié M, Dingkuhn M, Wopereis MCS, Miezan KM (1998). Rice crop duration and leaf appearance rate in a variable thermal environment. I. Development of an empirically based model, Field Crop. Res. 57, 1–13.
Singh U, Ritchie JT, Godwin DC (1993). A user’s guide to CERES Rice - v2.10. International Fertilizer Development Center: Muscle Shoals, AL, USA.
Wit AJW, Boogaard HL, Van Diepen CA (2005). Spatial resolution of precipitation and radiation: The effect on regional crop yield forecasts, Agr. Forest Meteorol. 135, 156–168.