Global Advanced Research Journal of Agricultural Science (GARJAS) ISSN: 2315-5094
February 2018 Vol. 7(2): pp. 046-052
Copyright © 2018 Global Advanced Research Journals

 

Full Length Research Paper

Evaluation of Correlations between Natural and Organizational-Production Factors in Bulgarian Agriculture 

S. Todorova, E. Rancheva, N. Bencheva

 

Agricultural University of Plovdiv

*Corresponding Author's Email: stelatodorova_au@hotmail.com

Accepted 15 February, 2018

 

Abstract

The article evaluates the regional differences in the interaction between natural and production organization factors in Bulgarian agriculture. The analysis ranged over the South Central Region and the whole country in the period 2007-2013. The indicators for the South Central Region were compared with the average indicators for Bulgaria, which played the role of a reference system. In addition to the descriptive statistics, GIS was also used to outline the specific soil and climatic areas that were to be examined. Based on this, the Index of Agro-environmental Potential (ISAP) was estimated both for the region and the country. A methodology based on specialized software was specifically designed for this purpose by regions and the country as a whole. The conducted study showed that the interaction direction and strength between the natural and production organization factors differed for the South Central Region and the country as a whole. The observed national trends and interdependencies of the examined factors do not always correctly reflect the scale and change effect in one region and the country, respectively. Due to the multifactorial determinants of agricultural production (natural and organizational-production), the effects of their impact on the region and the country differed. The latter was proved by the realization of different models of agricultural production, characterized with different levels of organization and intensity. The analysis showed the necessity of principle change - from sectoral to territorial, i.e. regionalization of the national agricultural policy. This approach should contribute to tool change for achieveing the policy objectives - moving away from subsidies to investment.

Keywords: natural factors; factors of production organization; regional differences; agri-environmental potential; regionalization; agricultural policy.

 

 

REFERENCES

 

Arcadiev D (2015). Population Growth in Medieval Bulgaria. Statistics Journal. 4: 111-142.

Brown L, Flavin C, French H (1997). State of the World. World watch Institute, W.W. Norton, New York: London, 229 pp.

Brown L, Renner M, Flavin C (1997). Vital Signs. World watch Institute, W.W. Norton, New York: London, 165 pp.

Daly H, Cobb J (1989). For the Common Good. Beacon Press, Boston, pp. 482

John Luke Gallup, Jeffrey Sachs, Andrew Mellinger (1999). Geography and Economic Development. International Regional Science Review. 22 (2): 179-232.

Krugman P (1999). What’s new about the new economic geography? Oxford review of economic policy. 14 (2): 7-17.

Niedzielski E (2015). Rural functions and their development. Issues of agricultural economics. 2 (343): 84-93.

Pearce D, Markandya A, Barbier E (1989). Blueprint for a Green Economy. Earthscan, London.

Runowski H (2014). Agricultural economics - transformations in agricultural holdings. In: Agriculture, food economy, rural areas - 10 years in the European Union. Warsaw. SGGW: 31-48.

Rouve А, Berriet-Solliec M (2010). Regionalization in European Agricultural Policy: Institutional Actualities, Issues and Prospects, Regional studies. 44 (8): 1005-1017.

UNDP, United Nations Development Programme, 1994, Annual Human Development Report. New York: Oxford University Press.

Valev V, Georgiev B (2004). Agri-ecological resources of Bulgaria - basis for designing in agriculture. NCAS. IP. Sofia: 110-115.

 Wackernagel M, Larry Onisto, Patricia Bello, Alejandro Callejas Linares,

Ina Susana Lo´pez Falfa´n, Jesus Me´ndez Garcı´a, Ana Isabel Sua´rez Guerrero,

Ma. Guadalupe Sua´rez Guerre (1999). National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept, Ecological Economics 29 (1999) 375–390

WRI, World Resources Institute (1996). World Resources 1996–1997. World Resources Institute, UNEP, UNDP, The World Bank, Washington DC.

http://www.nsi.bg/

http://www.issapp.org/

 

 

Current Issue

Viewing Options

View Full Article - PDF
Download Full Article - PDF

Search for Articles

S. Todorova on Google Scholar
S. Todorova on Pubmed
E. Rancheva on Google Scholar
E. Rancheva on Pubmed
N. Bencheva on Google Scholar
N. Bencheva on Pubmed

Statistics

Viewed 279
Printed 93
Downloaded 230
Powered By iPortal Works