Global Advanced Research Journal of Agricultural Science (GARJAS) ISSN: 2315-5094
September 2018 Vol. 7(9): pp. 281-285
Copyright © 2018 Global Advanced Research Journals
Full Length Research Paper
Effect of Different Spacing intervals on the Growth and Yield of Maize (Zea mays L.) in Mubi, Adamawa State
*Belel M.D and I Julde1
Department of Horticultural Technology, Federal Polytechnic, Mubi
*Corresponding Author's Email: email@example.com
Accepted 02 September, 2018
Improved white maize is one of the important cereal crops in Nigeria. There is little information on the optimum spacing intervals of improved white maize for optimum growth and yield in Nigeria. Field experiment was conducted at the students’ practical farm, of the Department of Agriculture Technology, Federal Polytechnic Mubi in during the 2013 cropping season, to assess the effects of different spacing intervals on growth and yield of maize). The field design was a randomized complete block design (RCBD) replicated three (3) times. Treatments consisted of three (3) different spacing intervals viz: 60 × 30cm, 60 × 40cm and 60 × 50cm. Data were collected on the growth and yield parameter are were analyzed. The result indicated a significant effect (P≤ 0.05) of spacing on plant height at eight weeks after sowing (8 WAS), stem diameter at 2WAS, days to first tasselling and number of cobs per plot. There was no effect of spacing o the yield of maize. Yield increase with increase in spacing, Spacing interval measuring 60× 50cm recorded a yield of 4, 622 kg ha-1, while the spacing intervals 60×30 and 60×40 recorded yields of 3,688 kg ha-1 and 4177 kg ha-1 respectively. Despite non-significant difference in yield, the spacing 60×50 cm is recommended for adoption by farmers of maize in the study area.
Keywords: Spacing, Population, Growth, Yield, Maize.
Adebayo AA (2004). Mubi Region: A Geographical Synthesis, 1st edition, pp: 17–25. Paraclete Publishers, Yola-Nigeria
Alford CM, Miller SD, Cecil JT (2004). Using the narrow to increase crop competition with weed. Proceedings of 4th International Crop Science Congress, Brisbanes, Australia.
Andrade FH, Calvino P, Cirilo A, Barbieri P (2002). Yield responsesto narrow rows depend on increased radiation interception, Agron. Journal. 94:975–980
Encarta (2007). Encarta premium suite; Encyclopedia. Microsoft cooperation seattle, USA.
Food and Agricultural Organization (1992). Production Yearbook: Food and Agricultural Organization
(FAO), Food and Nutrition Series, No.25 Maize 2 human nutrition FAO code: 80: AGRIS: S01ISBN:
Gozubenli,H.,Kilinc,M.,Sener,O.&Konuskan O. (2004). Effects ofsingle and twin row planting on yield and yield componentsin maize, Asian J. Plant Sci. 3:203–206.
Husseine FA, Metwalley EL, Desok ER (2008).Effect of plant spacing and weed control treatment on
Maize yield and associated weed in sandy soils. IDSI publication Cairo, Egypt.
Jagtap SS, Abamu FJ (2003). Matching improved maize production technologies to the resource base of farmers in moist savannah. 76: (3), 1067–1084.
Mabasa SAM, Rambakudsibga O, Ndebele NN, Bwakaya E (1995). A survey of Maize production practices in three communal area Zimbabwe. Paper presented at the Rockfeller soil fertility network meeting, 17-12 July Kadoma, Zimbabwe.
Marchan YB (1986). Crop production and management. Mohamprimlanifer oxford and I.B.H publishing Co. PVT. Ltd; New Delhi Indian.
Rehn S, Espig G (1991). The cultivated plant of the tropics and subtropics: Cultivation, Economic value, Utilization, Scientific book. Germany. Pp: 139.
Romney DL, Thorne P, Lukuyu B, Thorton PK (2003). Maize as food and feed in intensive small holder system: Management option for improved integration in mixed farming system of east and southern Africa. Field Crop, Research, 84: 159-168.
Tekwa IJ, Usman BH (2006). Estimation of soil loss by gully erosion in Mubi, Adamawa State, Nigeria. J. Environ., 1: 35–43
Sharratt BS, Mcwilliams DA (2005). Microclimatic and rootingcharacteristics of narrow-row versus conventional-row com, Agron. Journal. 97:1129–1135.
Udo, R.K. (1970). Geographical Regions of Nigeria, 1st edition, pp: 195– 197. Heinemann, London
Widdicombe WD, Thelen KD (2002). Row width and plant densityeffects on corn grain production in the northern Corn Belt, Agron. Journal. 94:1020–1023.
Xu JM, Gao HQ, Mao SG, Wang X, Li CS, Ji YQ, Lu WP (2008). Effects of
wide row space double plant cultivation on thecharacteristic of photosynthesis at later growth stage inmaize (Zea mays L.), Yangzhou Univ. J. 1: 66–70.
Xue JQ, Ma GS, Lu HD (2002). Studies of compact and big ear typemaize Shendan
902 on population characters of sink-source and yield formation. Acta Boreal-Occident. Sin. 22 1336–1342.
Zhao SL, Li F, Zhang M.D, Duan SS (1997). Crop production is apopulation progress, Acta Ecol. Sin. 17:100–104