Global Advanced Research Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences (GARJMMS) ISSN: 2315-5159
November 2017 Vol. 6(11), pp. 310-315
Copyright © 2017 Global Advanced Research Journals
Full Length Research Paper
ST Segment Elevation in Leads V5 and V6 for Predicting Culprit Artery in Acute Inferior Wall Myocardial Infarction
Madhu Gupta1, Maheshwar Prasad2, Sun Jian1, Rajesh Panjiyar3, Shankar Laudari3* and G Subramanyam3
1Cardiovascular Disease Center, The first hospital of Jilin University, Norman Bethune College of Medicine, Changchun, PR China, 130021
2Department of Medicine, National Medical College, Nepal
3Department of Cardiology, College of Medical Science, Nepal
*Corresponding Author E-mail: email@example.com; Phone: 9845112909
Accepted 25 July, 2017
ST elevation (ST↑) in the leads V5 and V6 to predict the culprit and furthermore, comparing the degree of ST ↑ in lead V6 with that in lead III. Patients were first divided according to the presence (n-62) and absence (n-98) with ST ↑ of ≥2 mm in leads V5 and V6, the patients were then further subdivided into the 2 groups according to the degree of ST ↑ in lead III and in lead V6 and were compared with coronary angiography. In patients with ST ↑ in leads V5 and V6, the infarct related artery was right coronary artery (RCA) in 66% and left circumflex artery (LCx) in 31%. The RCA was found significantly higher proportion in ST ↑ in leads V5 and V6 with ST ↑ in lead III>V6 (n-37; 82%) (p=0.0001), whereas the LCx disease in ST ↑ in leads V5 and V6 with ST ↑ in III≤V6 (n-12; 71%) (p-0.0001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value in ST ↑ in leads V5 and V6 with ST ↑ in lead III>V6 for RCA, and ST ↑ in lead III≤V6 for LCx to predict culprit artery were 90%, 63%, 84%, 75% and 63%, 90%, 75%, 84% respectively. ST elevation in leads V5 and V6 suggests a greater risk area in patient with acute inferior wall myocardial infarction. It also signifies a larger perfusion territory and demands for more aggressive reperfusion therapy.
Keywords: Infarct related artery (IRA); ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI); Right coronary artery (RCA); Left circumflex artery (LCX); Electrocardiogram (ECG).
Assali AR, Herz I, Vaturi M, Alder Y, Solodky A, Birnbaum Y, Sclarovsky S (1999). Electrocardiographic criteria for predicting the culprit artery in inferior wall acute myocardial infarction. Am. J. Cardiol. 84:87-89.
Assali AR, Sclarovsky S, Herz I, Adler Y, Porter A, Solodky A, Strasberg B (1998). Comparison of patients with inferior wall acute myocardial infarction with versus without ST-segment elevation in leads V5 and V6. Am. J. Cardiol. 81:81– 83.
Bairey CN, Shah PK, Lew AS, Hulse S (1987). Electrocardiographic differentiation of occlusion of the left circumflex versus the right coronary artery as a cause of inferior acute myocardial infarction. Am. J. Cardiol. 60:456-459.
Berger PB, Ryan TJ (1990). Inferior myocardial infarction: high-risk subgroups. Circulation. 81:401– 411
Braat SH, de Zwaan C,Brugada P, Coenegracht JM, Wellens HJ (1984). Right ventricularinvolvement with acute inferior wall myocardial infarction identifies high risk of developing atrioventricular nodal conduction disturbances. Am. Heart J. 107:1183–1187.
Chia BL, Yip JW, Tan HC, Lim TY (2000). Usefulness of ST elevation II/III ratio and ST deviation in lead I for identifying the culprit artery in inferior wall acute myocardial infarction. Am. J. Cardiol. 86:341-343.
Cooksey JD, Dunn M, Massie E (1977). Inferoposterior myocardial infarction. In: Cooksey JD, Dunn M, Massie E, eds. Clinical Vactrocardiography and Electorocardiography, 2.Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers. pp. 391– 427.
Dunn RF, Newman HN, Bernstein L, Harris PJ, Roubin GS, Morris J, Kelly DT (1984). The clinical features of isolated left circumflex coronary artery disease. Circulation. 69:477– 484.
Evans MA, Clements IP, Christian TF, Gibbons RJ (1998). Association between anterior ST depression and increased myocardial salvage following reperfusion therapy in patients with inferior myocardial infarction. Am. J. Med. 104:5–11
Fiol M, Cygankiewicz I, Carrillo A, Bayes-Genis A, Santoyo O, Gomez A, Bethencourt A (2004). Bayes de Luna A. Value of electrocardiographic algorithm based on “ups and downs” of ST in assessment of a culprit artery in evolving inferior wall acute myocardial infarction. Am. J. Cardiol. 94:709-714.
Hasdai D, Birnbaum Y, Herz I, Sclarowsky S, Mazur A, Solodky A (1995). ST segment depression in lateral limb leads in inferior wall acute myocardial infarction. Eur. Heart J. 16:1549-1553.
Herz I, Assali AR, Adler T, Solodky A, Sclarovsky S (1997). New electrocardiographic criteria for predicting either the right or left circumflex artery as the culprit coronary artery in inferior wall acute myocardial infarction. Am. J. Cardiol. 80:1343-1345.
Kontos MC, Desai PV, Jesse RL, Ornato JP (1997). Usefulness of the admission electrocardiogram for identifying the infarct-related artery in inferior wall acute myocardial infarction. Am. J. Cardiol. 79:182–184.
Kosuge M, Ebina T, Hibi K, Iwahashi N, Morita S, Endo M, Maejima N, Gouhara M, Nagashima Z, Umemura S, Kimura K (2012). Implications of ST-Segment elevation in leads V5 and V6 in patients with reperfused inferior wall acute myocardial infarction. Am. J. Cardiol. 109(3):314-319.
Kosuge M, Kimura K, Ishikawa T, Hongo Y, Mochida Y, Sugiyama M, Tochikubo O (1998). New electrocardiographic criteria for predicting the site of coronary artery occlusion in inferior wall acute myocardial infarction. Am. J. Cardiol. 82:1318-1322.
Peterson ED, Hathaway WR, Zabel KM, Pieper KS, Granger CB, Wagner GS, Topol EJ, Bates ER, Simoons ML, Califf RM (1996). Prognostic significance of precordial ST segment depression during inferior myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era: results in 16,521 patients. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 28:305–312.
Tierala I, Nikus KC, Sclarovsky S, Syvanne M, Eskola M (2009). Predicting the culprit artery in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction and introducing a new algorithm to predict infarct-related artery in inferior ST-elevation myocardial infarction: correlation with coronary anatomy in the HAAMU Trial. J. Electrocardiol. 42:120-127.
Wagner GS, Macfarlane P, Wellens H, Josephson M, Gorgels A, Mirvis DM, Pahlm O, Surawicz B, Kligfield P, Childers R, Gettes LS, Bailey JJ, Deal BJ, Gorgels A, Hancock EW, Kors JA, Mason JW, Okin P, Rautaharju PM, van Herpen G (2009). American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology, American College of Cardiology Foundation, Heart Rhythm Society. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part VI: Acute ischemia/infarction: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 53:1003–1011.
Zimetbaum PJ, Josephson ME (2003). Use of the electrocardiogram in acute myocardial infarction. N. Engl. J. Med. 348:933–940.
Zimetbaum PJ, Krishnan S, Gold A, Carrozza II JP, Josephson ME (1998). Usefulness of ST-segment elevation in lead III exceeding that of lead II for identifying the location of the totally occluded coronary artery in inferior wall myocardial infarction. Am. J. Cardiol. 81:918-919.
- Madhu Gupta on Google Scholar
- Madhu Gupta on Pubmed
- Maheshwar Prasad on Google Scholar
- Maheshwar Prasad on Pubmed
- Sun Jian on Google Scholar
- Sun Jian on Pubmed
- Rajesh Panjiyar on Google Scholar
- Rajesh Panjiyar on Pubmed
- Shankar Laudari on Google Scholar
- Shankar Laudari on Pubmed
- G Subramanyam on Google Scholar
- G Subramanyam on Pubmed